Community Aqueduct and their Water User Associations in the Fuquene Lake Basin
Case details
- Resource system
- Fuquene Lake Basin
- Resource units
- Water
- Location
- Fuquene Lake Basin
Location map
Description
This case synthesizes nine studies conducted around the Fuquene Lake Basin's community aqueducts and Water Users Associations (WUAs) between 2004 and 2016. Many WUAs face significant challenges due to water availability and local political and economic dynamics threatening their existence. Governmental and non-governmental entities focus on conserving biodiversity and protecting ecosystems in the basin but need more significant efforts to articulate the WUAs to this work. Also, formal rules from the Colombian government created to regulate the entities that provide water service, such as WUAs, do not fit the possibilities and particularities of WUAs' operating conditions and their territory.
Institutional analysis
Institutional analysis document
Download documentPreview document
Coded institutional data
No coded case data available.
System representation
Hover over diagram elements to see descriptions
Resource system
The Fuquene Lake Basin resource is water for domestic use or drinking water. Water availability in the basin depends on rainfall regimes, geomorphological, and hydrological processes, as well as the state of conservation of headwaters' ecosystems, composed of secondary forest and endemic highland ecosystems (páramos), and the distribution of power (political representation) across the basin. Water availability is lower in years with El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events and towards the north of the basin, where seasonal rainfall variation is higher. Man-induced ecological transformations, such as land-use change and point and nonpoint source pollution, reduces runoff in streams and rivers, which together with social inequalities leads to less water availability.Resource users
Households in rural areas, mostly composed of families of farmers and some non-farmer families, use drinking water from the community aqueducts for their domestic activities. Community aqueducts are managed by community-based organizations called Water Users Associations (WUAs), a second type of resource users, which are composed solely by water users. A network of 128 WUAs oversees the management and upkeep of community aqueducts throughout the basin. Each WUAs board determines water service tariffs, in compliance with formal regulations, and develops their own internal operating procedures (informal rules).Public infrastructure
Community aqueducts are hard infrastructures comprising channels, weirs, gates, irrigation networks, access roads and their maintenance, and drinking-water treatment plants. In addition to these primary structures, local communities construct supplementary infrastructures, such as fences around recharge zones and tree plantations for ecosystem restoration. Water treatment plants are built by contractors that are hired by municipal or state governments. National regulations for environmental conservation and water management are applied to this case (encompassing basin and subbasins’ management plans and various other regulatory instruments), and although there are official documents defining the concept and function of Water User Associations (WUAs), its regulation and operability are highly limited by the lack of proper policy instruments and guidelines. Contractors and other third-party actors hired to build, operate, supervise, maintain or monitor natural and artificial infrastructures. These private actors together with groups of organized communities, including WUAs, construct, maintain, and modify hard infrastructures (civil infrastructures) needed in community aqueducts.Public infrastructure providers
Depending on the action situation, Water Users Associations (WUAs) may be part of the Public Infrastructure Providers too. WUAs operate in compliance with regulations established by municipal and state governments, which also serve as Public Infrastructure Providers. In 2016, the Basin Council, a type of consultative and representative body for all actors living and conducting activities within a hydrographic basin, was constituted to integrate a wide array of non-governmental actors, including productive farmer organizations and cooperatives, NGOs, private sector companies, public service providers (some of which are WUAs), community action boards, and academic institutions, and, on the governmental side, the council includes mayors and regional governmental entities. The studies referenced for this case, however, provide limited insight into the behavior and interactions within this council. Notable observations are confined mostly to mentions of multi-actor participation in informational events, lacking detailed analysis of the council's dynamics.Relationship 1
Water Users Associations (WUAs) extract water for house consumption. Households within community aqueducts’ coverage use the water delivered through community aqueducts to their homes, which later release untreated wastewater back into the Resource System, causing point source pollution. Farmers inhabiting the basin (some of which use water from community aqueducts) convert forest and highland areas into zones for agriculture and livestock, and use fertilizers and pesticides in the agricultural productive practices. These activities result in the contamination of soil and water and the degradation of crucial ecosystems, (e.g., forest, unique highland environments, riparian corridors, and wetlands), and their impact on water available for domestic consumption varies geographically. Thus, the feedback from the Resource System results in disparities in the access to water affecting certain rural populations. During drought periods or in situations where access to water is insufficient to meet water demands in rural households (mainly in the northern part of the basin and in the higher and steeper areas), private infrastructures are used at a household level to harvest rainwater.Relationship 2
Users inform providers about issues and state of community aqueducts and ecosystems in the basin. They file complaints and install collective demands directed at state entities responsible for regulating water resources and water services. Also, users elect WUAs’ representatives and administrative board. Resource Users, specifically WUAs and other actors living and conducting activities within the basin, participate in public events where officials inform and occasionally involve civilians in government decisions concerning water use, water management, and environmental planning. Local and regional governments implement community engagement and education programs as part of the basin's management strategies. NGOs and Academic institutions are some of the external actors that support the development of these participative programs. WUAs deliberate internally on projects and funding requirements, submit funding requests to local authorities, such as mayor offices, and apply for environmental permits, following the procedures established by regional governing entities. Conversely, WUAs receive approved permits that authorize them to access and extract water. WUAs facilitate local collaboration in constructing and maintaining essential drinking water infrastructures. Clientelism represents a type of interaction that is detrimental to the local community's capacity for self-organized and collaborative efforts. This takes place when local government members pay or give gifts to representatives of community organizations (including some WUAs), or when local government members’ favoritism results in the approval and allocation of funds that supports WUAs’ projects; all of this in return for political support.Relationship 3
Rules and investment decisions reached within the Public Infrastructure Providers realm, are communicated to actors within the Public Infrastructure, who then proceed to adopt them. Actors within the Public Infrastructure inform providers of the condition of small roads, needed to access the community aqueduct network, and other hard Public Infrastructures (natural or artificial).Relationship 4
The Public Infrastructures impact the Resource System with the construction of canal networks, storage tanks, and water treatment plants, which serves the purpose of ensuring future water access and managing flood risks, but transforms the natural structure and processes. In return, hydrological, climatological, and geomorphological processes within the Resource System, cause artificial infrastructures to erode and prevents them from function in an optimal way (e.g., accumulation of sediments and debris obstructs the flow of rainwater through built canals). This demands constant maintenance and higher operational costs. Besides, afforestation, reforestation, and ecosystem restoration actions undertaken by actors from the Public Infrastructures element, are actions commonly used to sustain the provision of ecological services in the basin. Finally, monitoring networks play a crucial role in observing and understanding both the natural and artificial components of the Resource System.Relationship 5
Infrastructures necessary to treat potable water are insufficient to cover the demands for domestic water from community aqueducts.Relationship 6
Public Infrastructures contain state regulations that establish the necessary quality criteria for human consumption. Several Resource Users resort to low-cost technologies to purify the water, such as filters and chlorine tablets, among others. Also, some users vandalize parts of the irrigation system, while others collaborate in its maintenance and that of the access routes to the water capture and distribution system. Other state rules establish that only inhabitants of the rural areas of the basin can access water from community aqueducts, which applies to most of the basin, except certain households in urban areas that are legally covered by community aqueducts. Communication channels have been designated for collecting and transmitting information about the functioning of Public Infrastructures and the state of socio ecological systems within the basin (from the users to Public Infrastructure Providers, via Public Infrastructure). Rather than using official channels, Resource Users often inform Public Infrastructure Providers directly. Some WUAs and community actors don’t comply with mandates about registering to the Chamber of Commerce or in requesting permits to access and extract water from natural sources. Even though WUAs play a key role in facilitating local collaboration for constructing and maintaining essential drinking water infrastructures, it is often observed that neighbors, community action boards, and other local organizations actively participate in coordinating activities. Institutional instruments developed by Public Infrastructure Providers, are implemented by actors within the Public Infrastructure realm to resolve and attend to claims, requests, and demands made by users. However, some users don’t trust private or public actors.Exogenous drivers (7) - Resource
(none specified)Exogenous drivers (7) - Infrastructure
(none specified)Exogenous drivers (8) - Users
(none specified)Exogenous drivers (8) - Providers
(none specified)Human infrastructure (users)
(none specified)Human infrastructure (providers)
(none specified)Sources
Contributors
Bibliography
- (2012). Does External Funding Help Adaptation? Evidence from Community-Based Water Management in the Colombian Andes. Environmental Management. 52
-
(2011).
Collective action for watershed management: field experiments in Colombia and Kenya.
Environment and Development Economics.
16
(3)
DOI: 10.1017/S1355770X10000392