CPR Database - Record #50158.1
Summary
The resource appropriated from Obara Pond is water (for irrigation). This irrigation system is comprised of a pond of over two acres in area, and the ditches leading water to 10 acres of farmland.
Screener and Citation
RESOURCE:
The resource appropriated from Obara Pond is water (for irrigation). This irrigation system is comprised of a pond of over two acres in area, and the ditches leading water to 10 acres of farmland.
SCREENER:
Case: Obara Pond, Japan
The information regarding the following common-pool resource system was taken from empirical evidence from a field setting. Data on the system was extracted from a chapter in a book. Currently, there are no additional documents to cite which may provide further information about this common-pool resource.
These documents describe two resources in detail. The primary resource is the Obara Pond, situated in Niiike buraku of Japan. More generally, it is located in Orient. The system's sector is that of water. Relatively good information has been collected about the stakes of participants who appropriate from Obara Pond. The condition of this resource is well understood. Complete information is available regarding the strategies used by key groups interacting with the system. There is thorough documentation of the operational rules for this resource. This is the result of a high level of confidence that the authors who recorded the features of Obara Pond have a complete knowledge of its particulars. Furthermore, the authors have provided sufficient data to formulate a structured coding process.
The Obara Pond covers approximately 40470.0 sq. meters. At the beginning of the period discussed by the authors, there was an apparently balanced supply of biological and physical resources withdrawn compared to the number of units available. Appropriator teams for the resource are always formally organized.
The Obara Pond was a small-scale water resource. According to the article, it was managed quite well by the users with the presence of a larger collective organization, the oaza.
CITATION(S):
Beardsley, Richard K., John W. Hall, and Robert E. Ward (1959) "Japanese Irrigation Cooperatives." In VILLAGE JAPAN. Chicago: The University of Chicago, reprinted in (1980) IRRIGATION AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN ASIA: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, edited by Walter E. Coward Jr., 127-152. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Resource and Location
RESOURCE INFO:
The resource appropriated from Obara Pond is water (for irrigation). It is produced physically and is a renewable moving (fugitive) unit. This irrigation system is comprised of a pond of over two acres in area, and the ditches leading water to 10 acres of farmland.
The boundary of this resource has natural/constructed attributes which do not limit entry. The boundaries of this resource are smaller than the location, and exist in one country, and are not divided among multiple general purpose local jurisdictions at a single level. The boundaries of this resource are independent of a development project designed by non-residents.
There are not distinct and stable micro-environmental or ecological zones within this resource (educated guess). The quality and/or quantity of units is not regularly better in some of the zones than in others (educated guess). 0 created conflict among appropriators.
3 (educated guess). There are strategic points within the resource where the main flow of the water (for irrigation) can be controlled (inferred). There is not considerable variation over space in the availability of water (for irrigation) within the resource (educated guess). There is considerable, and mildly predictable variation in the flow of water (for irrigation) within a single year (inferred). There is not considerable variation in the flow of water (for irrigation) from year to year (educated guess).
The topography of the resource or the land immediately around the resource is gently undulating (educated guess).The bottom topography of Obara Pond is 0.
If no rules in use were being followed, the relationship among the appropriation processes would have 0.
The boundaries of the production resource are roughly equivalent to the boundaries of the appropriation resource (inferred). The boundaries of the production resource are not equivalent to the boundaries of the location, but lie within the boundaries of the location (highly confident). The boundaries of the distribution resource are roughly equivalent to the boundaries of the appropriation resource (highly confident). The boundaries of the production resource are not equivalent to the boundaries of the distribution resource. Production is within the boundaries of distribution.
The irrigators being served by this production organization do not participate in the selection of the officials of the production agency except as citizens in a general election (highly confident). The irrigators being served by this production organization 0. 0 operated by the same agency(s) (or the same group(s) of people) as the headworks of the system.
LOCATION:
The appropriation resources are situated ## Unknown column: LOCDSCPT_X ##. The boundaries of the location are ## Unknown column: LOCBOUND_X ##. The appropriation resource present in this location consists of ## Unknown column: RESPRES_X ##. Regarding the use of the irrigation system, there were ## Unknown column: RESCONF ## in the relationships among appropriation processes.
The system is located within ## Unknown column: ONECOUNT ##. The country dominant with respect to its political jurisdiction of the resource is ## Unknown column: COUNTRY ##. It is located in ## Unknown column: LOCNAME ##. Within this country, the system's location is ## Unknown column: LOCJURIS ##. The name of the primary local jurisdiction is ## Unknown column: JURINAM1 ##. Another local jurisdiction is ## Unknown column: JURINAM1 ##. The size of this location is ## Unknown column: LOCSIZE ## . A permanent population ## Unknown column: PERMPOP ## year round in this location . There are roughly ## Unknown column: NUMPOP ## in habitants here . The households in this location number ## Unknown column: NUMHOU ## . People live here ## Unknown column: MONTHRES ## months out of the year . There ## Unknown column: FREQCOMM ## frequent contact and communication between people in this location and officials in a nearby administrative center . This location is ## Unknown column: CROMETR2 ## meters away from a major marketing center in the region . Additionally, the most common mode of transportation in this region is ## Unknown column: MODETRA2 ##. This location is also characterized by an economy that is ## Unknown column: ECONOLOC ## .
The latitude of this location is ## Unknown column: LATITUDE ##, and its longitude is ## Unknown column: LONGITUD ##. The elevation of this location is ## Unknown column: MEANELEV ## meters. The highest elevation is ## Unknown column: HIGHELEV ##. The lowest elevation of this location is ## Unknown column: LOWELEV ##. ## Unknown column: TEMPERTR ## degrees ## Unknown column: TEMPUNIT ## is the average annual temperature . The region's average annual rainfall is ## Unknown column: RAINYEAR ##. The region's average annual evapotranspiration is ## Unknown column: EVAPYEAR ##. The distribution of rainfall and evapotranspiration per month is as follows:
January precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRJAN ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVJAN ##
February precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRFEB ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVFEB ##
March precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRMAR ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVMAR ##
April precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRAPR ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVAPR ##
May precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRMAY ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVMAY ##
June precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRJUN ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVJUN ##
July precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRJUL ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVJUL ##
August precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRAUG ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVAUG ##
September precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRSEP ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVSEP ##
October precipitation: ## Unknown column: PROCT ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVOCT ##
November precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRNOV ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVNOV ##
December precipitation: ## Unknown column: PRDEC ##, evapotraspiration: ## Unknown column: EVDEC ##
Operational Levels and Subgroup
RESOURCE:
The resource appropriated from Obara Pond is water (for irrigation). This irrigation system is comprised of a pond of over two acres in area, and the ditches leading water to 10 acres of farmland.
OPERATIONAL LEVEL:
TYPE OF SITUATION
The processes described in the related documents are primarily related to appropriation, production, distribution and use. The formal owner(s) of the resource discussed in this study . The set of individuals who have rights to withdraw from this resource 0.0. As of the beginning of this period, the owners 0.0 access to this resource. Since the beginning of this period, the appropriators .
EVENTS MARKING THE BEGINNING ACTION SITUATION
It is estimated that the operational level coded on this form ended in 1950.0. The estimated duration of the patterns that are described in this form is 51 to 75 years. Throughout the duration there were no changes made in operational, collective, or consititutional rules. There was no change in resource size or structure. There was no new technology introduced to the system over the duration of the patterns coded on this form. There was no substantial external change in the value of the units appropriated. The quantity of units available did not change due to a change in appropriation patterns of other appropriators' withdrawals from the same production or distribution resource. There were no new groups starting to withdraw units from the appropriation resource. There was no recorded change to one or more variables internal to the operational level. The author begins the description of this case at this point in history.
CONDITIONS AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF PERIOD COVERED BY THIS FORM*
For biological resources at the beginning of this period, the balance between the quantity of units withdrawn and the number of units available was apparently balanced (educated guess). For biological resources at the end of this period, the balance between the quantity of units withdrawn and the number of units available was apparently balanced (educated guess). For physical resources at the beginning of this period, the balance between the quantity of units withdrawn and the quantity of units needed, given the usual patterns of use for these units was apparently balanced (educated guess). For physical resources at the end of the period the balance between the quantity of units withdrawn and the quantity of units needed, given the usual patterns of use for these units, was apparently balanced (educated guess).
The following includes the available statistics on the use of this resource at the beginning of the time period, followed by the end of the time period:
Tons of fish harvested per year at the beginning of the period: 0
Tons of fish harvested per year at the end of the period: 0
Square meters of fields irrigated at the beginning of the period: 0
Square meters of fields irrigated at the end of the period: 0
Volume of annual flow used at the beginning of the period: 0
Volume of annual flow used at the end of the period: 0
0. 0.
*In fisheries and other biological systems, this is the maximum sustainable number of units. In irrigation, this refers to the optimal water requirements of the crops in the established fields served by this system.
As of the beginning of the period, the quality of the units being withdrawn from the resource was passable (educated guess). As of the end of the period, the quality of the units being withdrawn from the resource was passable (educated guess). At the beginning of the period of the study, there were no problems of pollution in this or other resources, due to the way units are being appropriated. At the end of the period of the study, there were no problems of pollution in this or other resources due to the way units are being appropriated. As of the beginning of the period, the extent of technical externalities resulting from the appropriation activities of participants from this resource was quite low (ambiguous). As of the end of the period, the extent of technical externalities resulting from the appropriation activities of participants from this resource was quite low. At the beginning of this study, the interference between the appropriation technology for this resource and the appropriation processes for other resources in this location had no effect on the appropriation resources (educated guess). At the end of this study, the interference between the appropriation technology for this resource and the appropriation processes for other resources in this location had no effect on the appropriation resources (educated guess). At the beginning of this study, holding all inputs constant 0. At the end of this study, holding all inputs constant 0. At the beginning of this study the appropriation resource was 0. At the end of this study the appropriation resource was well maintained, and in excellent working order (inferred). At the beginning of this period the appropriators shared moderate to high levels of mutual trust (e.g. oral promises given high credence) (inferred). At the end of the period the appropriators shared 0. ## Unknown command: Start ##By the end of this period no change had occurred in the property rights regime related to the appropriation resource (educated guess). At the end of this period 0 closed access to this resource. At the end of the period 0.
INFORMATION LEVELS
There 4 for use by the appropriators. Maps and/or charts of the 6. The appropriators of this resource can be seen by each other while withdrawing units from the resource (educated guess). are in radio communication with each other while appropriating from the resource. There are not actions being taken, by appropriators or officials, to generate information about the condition of the resource (educated guess). records of the withdrawals from this resource kept in a systematic way. records of the physical factors which directly affected the resource kept in a systematic way. There are sometimes records of the appropriators' contributions to monitoring of the resource kept in a systematic way. 0 records of the appropriators' contribution to the maintenance of the resource kept in a systematic way. 0 kept in a language accessible to most of the appropriators. The keepers of these records 0. 0 available for inspection by appropriators. There are arenas being used for the exchange of information about conditions of the resource (ambiguous). Appropriators get together to discuss mutual problems of the resource weekly (ambiguous). The appropriators have an intimate knowledge of the characteristics of this resource.
POTENTIAL ACTIONS AND LEVELS OF CONTROL
There are no specialized staff or workers to undertake maintenance (highly confident). The quality or quantity of the units available to the appropriators are not adversely affected by the strategies of prior appropriators, because there are no prior appropriators (inferred). There are not problems of pollution resulting from activities of others who are not appropriators of this resource or inhabitants of this location (e.g. acid rain, sewage disposal) (educated guess). 6 (confident). 3 an insurance mechanism available to the appropriators related to variability of income from the resource.
PATTERNS OF INTERACTION
Differences between subgroups relating to gender identification does not affect communication (educated guess). Differences between subgroups relating to ethnic identification does not exist (inferred). Differences between subgroups relating to clan identification does not affect communication (educated guess). Differences between subgroups relating to racial identification does not exist (inferred). Differences between subgroups relating to caste identification does not affect communication (educated guess). Differences between subgroups relating to religious identification does not affect communication (educated guess). Differences between subgroups relating to languages spoken does not exist (inferred). Differences between subgroups relating to general cultural views of the resource system and its use does not exist (inferred). Differences between subgroups relating to any problems that affect communication 0.
The general manner in which appropriators related to one another during this study is a relatively positive, reciprocal manner -- the presumption was made that long-term relationships are involved and positive actions are undertaken without a specific expectation of return. The documents present evidence of specific types of cooperative activities between the appropriators related to other local resources, as well as evidence that the appropriators have a general cultural pattern that stressed various types of cooperative activities besides the management of this resource. If someone violated the rules-in-use related to the appropriation process from this resource, it is likely that he/she would encounter social sanctions imposed by other appropriators (who are not filling posititions as official monitors) (ambiguous). If someone violates the rules-in-use related to the appropriation process from this resource, it is likely as not that he/she would encounter physical sanctions by other appropriators (who are not filling posititions as official monitors) (ambiguous). If someone violates the rules-in-use related to the appropriation process from this resource, it is likely that an official monitor or guard would move to impose sanctions (ambiguous). 5 imposed depending on rule infractions and in regard to social, physical, and official sanctions. It is 6 that local appropriators would attempt to bribe an official if an official monitor or guard moved to impose sanctions.
POSITIONS AND PARTICIPANTS
At the end of the period studied the position of non-appropriator (individuals prevented from using the resource) did exist. There was a close estimate of 0 participant(s) in this position. At the end of the period studied there was an estimate of 51-100 participant(s) in this position (educated guess). At the beginning of the period there was a general estimate of 25-50 appropriators (inferred). There was a general estimate of 0 appropriators at the end of the period. A general estimate of the number of participants in the team appropriation process was 25-50, at the beginning of the period (highly confident). A general estimate of the number of participants in the team appropriation process was 0, at the end of the period. The \"official\" position of monitor (apart from the willingness of all appropriators to monitor) does exist, and appropriators (not necessarily all) rotated into this position (highly confident).
0 the appropriation activities of each other apart from the monitoring of any \"official\" guards. The general estimate for the number of official monitors on duty at one time during peak hours was 1-5 (highly confident). Very few of the monitors were full-time (highly confident).
NUMBER AND RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SUBGROUPS
There will be 1.0 subgroup form(s) completed in relation to this operational level form. The ID number(s) of the subgroup(s) coded are as follows: 31.0 - 0.0 - 0.0 - 0.0
EVALUATION OF RESULTS
There are no appropriators who were consistently disadvantaged in this period (educated guess). The relatively worst off appropriators have not been cut out of their benefits from this resource or substantially harmed (educated guess). By the end of the period studied the distance between those who were the least advantaged and those who were the most advantaged could be characterized as remaining relatively constant over time (educated guess).
AUTHOR'S EVALUATION AND CAUSAL ASSUMPTIONS
In this coding form the author on the readers' concept of results and the evaluation of results.
SUBGROUP:
Participants:
## Unknown column: SBGPDES_X ## ## Unknown column: WELDEFIN ##. ## Unknown column: BNUMUSR1 ##. ## Unknown column: ENUMUSR1 ##. ## Unknown column: LITERACY ##.
The following statements characterize the composition of this subgroup's population with respect to variables that may affect the capacity to communicate effectively:
## Unknown column: SGENDER1 ##. ## Unknown column: SGENDER2 ## ## Unknown column: SETHID1 ##. ## Unknown column: SETHID2 ## ## Unknown column: SCLANID1 ##. ## Unknown column: SCLANID2 ##. ## Unknown column: SRACEID1 ##. ## Unknown column: SRACEID2 ##. ## Unknown column: SCASTE1 ##. ## Unknown column: SCASTE2 ##. ## Unknown column: SRELID1 ##. ## Unknown column: SRELID2 ##. ## Unknown column: SLANG1 ##. ## Unknown column: SLANG2 ##. Problems within this group that are also mentioned by the author stem from ## Unknown column: LISTPROB_X ##.
## Unknown column: SNUMTEM1 ##. ## Unknown column: TEAMSIZE ##. ## Unknown column: TEAMBASE ##.
Legal Rights:
## Unknown column: ACCESS ##. ## Unknown column: WITHDRAW ##. ## Unknown column: MANAGE ##. ## Unknown column: EXCLUDED ##. Members of this subgroup ## Unknown column: EXCLUDIN ##. The separable right of transfer to the flow of units from this resource is ## Unknown column: TRANFLOW ##. The separable rights to exercise transfer to shares of this appropriation resource, or closely related production and/or distribution resources are ## Unknown column: TRANSHAR ##. Transferring shares of major appropriation equipment which are necessary to engage in appropriation ## Unknown column: EQIPSHAR ##.
Stakes and Resources:
The length of time this subgroup has regularly appropriated from this resource is ## Unknown column: LGTHUSE ##. ## Unknown column: RESIDENT ##. ## Unknown column: OFFSPRNG ##. ## Unknown column: TEAMCAP ## to build or to earn enough income to purchase the equipment for an appropriation team. ## Unknown column: $AMOUNT ##. ## Unknown column: OTHRCURR ##. Given the assets of members, the capital required to set up an appropriation team ## Unknown column: KPRESURE ##. ## Unknown column: FAMINCDE ##. ## Unknown column: SUBNOT ## of this subgroup work a substantial amount of time in activities not associated with appropriation from this resource. ## Unknown column: SUBSIM ##. Given the economy of the location, the average annual family income (including all non-monetary forms of income) is considered ## Unknown column: AVERINC ##. ## Unknown column: SUBVAR ##. ## Unknown column: LONGVAR ##. ## Unknown column: ASSETS ##. ## Unknown column: ALTSUPLY ##.
Potential Actions and Levels of Control:
Considering that there are multiple subgroups using this resource, most of the appropriators withdraw units ## Unknown column: SUBWHERE ##. A noticeable impact on the balance of the quantity of units withdrawn and the number of units available in this resource would ## Unknown column: OLSON ##. Keeping in mind the physically available levels of withdrawal that are possible from this resource, the following shows the extent to which rules concerning different aspects of withdrawal constrain appropriation:## Unknown column: RULTECHC #### Unknown column: RULTIMEC #### Unknown column: RULQUANC #### Unknown column: MARGVALU ##
Technology:
The most recent technological change experienced by this subgroup was ## Unknown column: TECHTIME ##. The appropriative power of the technology used ## Unknown column: TECHEXTR ##.
Strategies Adopted:
## Unknown column: USERATE1 ##. ## Unknown column: USERATE2 ##. ## Unknown column: OWNLABOR ## invested resources, such as their own labor, in maintaining or improving the structure of the appropriation resource. Investment into constructing or improving production or distribution works for maintaining or improving their resource has ## Unknown column: ENHANCE ##. Resources have ## Unknown column: AVOIDHRM ##. ## Unknown column: MAINCONT ##. ## Unknown column: SUBALT1 ##. ## Unknown column: SUBALT2 ## . At least one member has assumed entrepreneurial activity in trying to achieve coordinated strategies in relationship to ## Unknown column: ENTACT ##. In characterizing the usual behavior of the members of this subgroup with respect to local operation level rules-in-use (other than in extreme shortage), it can be said that ## Unknown column: RULEFOLL ##. ## Unknown column: RULEBRAK ##. ## Unknown column: PRONURUL ## has been proposed to alter the operational or collective-choice rules affecting the appropriation from this resource.
Subgroup Results:
This subgroup appropriates ## Unknown column: SHARE% ## of its total appropriated units at the end of this period. ## Unknown column: SHARCHNG ##. ## Unknown column: ABSOQUAN ##.
Operational Rules
RESOURCE:
The resource appropriated from Obara Pond is water (for irrigation). This irrigation system is comprised of a pond of over two acres in area, and the ditches leading water to 10 acres of farmland.
OPERATIONAL RULES:
Concerning national collective choice relating to the resource, ## Unknown column: NATCOLCH ##. Concerning regional collective choice, ## Unknown column: REGCOLCH ##.
With regard to local collective choice, ## Unknown column: LOCCOLCH ##.
Boundary Rules
The authors are concerning the accuracy of the resource's Boundary Rules.The following rules define the requirements that must be met before individuals are eligible to harvest or withdraw units from the appropriation resource.
An entry fee or license is required or permitted and ## Unknown column: LICLIMIT ##.
The sum of the fees and licenses is ## Unknown column: SUMFEES1 ##.
When an entry fee or license is required or permitted, the sum is ## Unknown column: SUMFEES2 ##.
The license or entry fees are not the same across all categories of applicants, so that ## Unknown column: SAMEFEES ##.
## Unknown column: RTRANS1 ##.
Within one generation of potential resource appropriators, ## Unknown column: RTRANS2 ##.
When transfer on a temporary or permanent basis is allowed, ## Unknown column: RTRANS3 ## determines to whom such rights can be transferred.
The boundary rules ## Unknown column: UNEQPRIB ##.
## Unknown column: RULSETSB ##
Authority and Scope Rules
The default conditions for both authority and scope rules ## Unknown column: DEFAUTH ##. The entire section regarding authority and scope rules has a confidence level of ## Unknown column: CLAUTH ##.
The following paragraphs include information on rules of ## Unknown column: NCYCLES ## cycle(s).
Authority and Scope Rules
The default conditions for both authority and scope rules ## Unknown column: DEFAUTH ##. ## END markup expected ##The entire section regarding authority and scope rules has a confidence level of ## Unknown column: CLAUTH ##.
The following paragraphs include information on rules of ## Unknown column: NCYCLES ## cycle(s).
Authority Rules:
## Unknown column: SEASONLN ##.
The authority and scope rules ## Unknown column: UNEQPRIA ##.
Scope Rules:
Individuals are ## Unknown column: WORKOWN ## required to work primarily on those parts of the resource that can affect their own level of appropriation from the resource. ## Unknown column: ELABSUBS ##. Most of the time, ## Unknown column: LABORG ##. When the labor force is organized into small teams, each ## Unknown column: ADJOINFD ## formed by individuals who farm adjoining fields. ## Unknown column: UNEQDUTA ##.
Information Rules
The authors are regarding the accuracy of the following Information Rules.
This information was recorded by ## Unknown column: NUMUNIT ##.
This information was recorded by ## Unknown column: QUALUNIT ##.
This information was recorded by ## Unknown column: CONDRES ##.
This information was recorded by ## Unknown column: UNITFLOW ##.
This information was recorded by ## Unknown column: APPWORK ##.
This information was recorded by ## Unknown column: APPMONIT ##.
This information was recorded by ## Unknown column: PHYSFACT ##.
This information was recorded by ## Unknown column: APPRIGHT ##.
This information was recorded by ## Unknown column: QASSETS ##.
Payoff Rules
The default condition, that all appropriators can retain whatever they can physically keep hold of and no external rewards, taxes, or sanctions are imposed ## Unknown column: DEFPAY ##. The authors have the following confidence level for the results of this section: ## Unknown column: CLPAY ##. Incarceration ## Unknown column: INCARCER ## as penalty on appropriators for breaking rules related to the appropriation of this resource. ## Unknown column: FINES ## fines can be imposed on appropriators for breaking rules related to the appropriation of this resource. Appropriators ## Unknown column: LOSEENTR ## lose their entry or appropriation rights for breaking rules related to the appropriation of the resource. Severe community shunning ## Unknown column: SHUNNING ## as a sanction that is consciously imposed on appropriators who break rules related to the appropriation of this resource. Appropriators ## Unknown column: EXTAID1 ## to develop their appropriation technologies. Appropriators ## Unknown column: EXTAID2 ## to develop or repair their production, distribution, or appropriation resources. Appropriators ## Unknown column: EXTAID3 ## to develop technologies for using the resource units. Appropriators ## Unknown column: PRICESUP ## for the selling of resource units or commodities produced by resource units. The payoff rules ## Unknown column: UNEQREW ##. The payoff rules ## Unknown column: UNEQPUN ##.
There ## Unknown column: NARRANGE ## by which the appropriation process is organized by teams.## Unknown column: RULSETSP_X ##. The following percentages indicate the percentages assigned to individual positions. If more than one percentage is listed per position, the individual percentages refer to the different arrangements existing within the operational rules.
Owner(s) (non-operator(s)) of primary appropriation equipment:
## Unknown column: PERPOS11 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS12 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS13 ##%
Owner(s) - operators(s) of primary appropriation equipment:
## Unknown column: PERPOS21 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS22 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS23 ##%
Owner(s) (non-operator(s)) of supplementary appropriation equipment:
## Unknown column: PERPOS31 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS32 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS33 ##%
Owner(s) - operator(s) of supplementary appropriation equipment:
## Unknown column: PERPOS41 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS42 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS43 ##%
Crew with special assets (including non-owner captain):
## Unknown column: PERPOS51 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS52 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS53 ##%
Regular crew (each):
## Unknown column: PERPOS61 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS62 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS63 ##%
Other:
## Unknown column: PERPOS71 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS72 ##%; ## Unknown column: PERPOS73 ##%
## Unknown column: EQSHARED_X ##. ## Unknown column: WAGEUSE_X ##. ## Unknown column: NOSETPER_X ##.
Aggregation Rules
The default condition, that no rules specify contraints or requirements on the process to be used in deciding which actions will be taken, and that appropriators can have as much independence in deciding upon actions as they are physically able to exert, ## Unknown column: DEFAGGR ##. The authors have the following confidence level for the results of this section: ## Unknown column: CLAGGR ##. ## Unknown column: AGGRRULE ##
Overall Questions About Rules Configuration
The general framework of the rules-in-use has governed the activities of this subgroup for ## Unknown column: RULEDUR ##. These rules ## Unknown column: WRITTEN ##. The author ## Unknown column: RULETRAN ## discuss how knowledge about the rules-in-use is transmitted from one generation of appropriators to another. In the author's estimation, the rules ## Unknown column: EASYUND ##. Also, it ## Unknown column: CLEAR ## as to what constitutes rule conforming and rule breaking behavior. The rules ## Unknown column: FLEXIBLE ## flexible in dealing with times of emergency or unusual problems facing particular members of the subgroup. They ## Unknown column: FAIR ## perceived by this group as fair, and ## Unknown column: LEGITIM ## perceived as legitimate.