Yuracare forest community, Department of Cochabamba, northern Bolivia
Case details
- Resource system
- Forest ecosystem and associated watershed
- Resource units
- Floral and faunal resources, including fuelwood, fodder, timber, water, and wildlife
- Location
- Yuracare, Cochabamba, northern Bolivia
Location map
Description
The Yuracare forest community is located in the department of Cochabamba, in northern Bolivia. It encompasses a geographical area of 250,000 ha in the Rio Charape watershed. The case study spans from early 1990s to 1997, and catalogues an action situation involving 400 families, which are dependent on the forest for fuelwood, fodder, timber, water, and game species, among others. Timber and a variety of forest products are the main stationary resource units.
This case illustrates how external drivers can disturb common-pool resources systems by affecting resource use patterns through the introduction of an economic activity based on natural resource extraction. The external intervention introduced scarcity to the system.
The original case study authors focused on the viability of a self-managed system by indigenous communities such as the Yucare community. The case study has subsequently been used in comparative analyses regarding Ostrom's Design Principles (see bibliography).
As one of the cases analyzed by Cox et al. (2010), it was deemed as a failure due to deterioration of timber natural infrastructure and social infrastructure. Cox et al. (2010) and Baggio et al. (2016) identified the following design principles in this case: clearly defined social boundaries (1A), clearly defined biophysical boundaries (1B), collective choice arrangements (3), monitoring (4A), monitoring the monitors (4B), graduated sanctions (5), conflict-resolution mechanisms (6), rights to organize (7), nestedness (8).
Institutional analysis
Institutional analysis document
Download documentPreview document
Coded institutional data
No coded case data available.
System representation
Resource system
Key shared resources - fruit and medicine forest gardens, domestic and commercial timber tree species, game species.
Resource users
Yuracare people
Public infrastructure
Soft human-made infrastructure:
Yuracare forest management rules and practices related to resource use, designation of land areas to the tenure of families, and periodic rotations in land use.
Bolivia's Department of Forestry (DIDF)
Yuracare Forest Associations
Public infrastructure providers
Cacique Mayor in the clans
Board of Consejo Indigena Yuracare in the Corregimientos
Board of Forest Associations
Families make decisions about management of their Kuklete
Relationship 1
(RS => RU)
Food, medicine and commercial timber.
(RU => RS)
About 400 families Yuracare people produce garden forests from which they harvest food and medicine, and which are also attractive for game species that they hunt.
After the intervention of the government, the Yuracare also started to harvest timber species for commercial purposes.
Relationship 2
(RU => PIP)
Families of each clan elect their Cacique Mayor
Families and clans of each Corregimiento elect representatives of the Consejo Indigena Yuracare
(PIP => RU)
Resource use is regulated by the Yuracare’s internal rules and norms (including temporal and spatial restrictions to hunting, for instance)
Relationship 3
(PIP => PI)
PIPs are responsible for establishing and maintaining rules and practices related to resource use.
(PI => PIP)
None specified.
Relationship 4
Rules and practices affect general conditions and conservation status of the forest.
Relationship 5
Market demand and government incentive changed the interaction between RU and RS, leading to overharvest of timber species.
Relationship 6
(PI => RU)
Spatial and temporal restrictions to resource use (mainly focused on fruiting trees and game species).
Exogenous drivers (7) - Resource
(none specified)Exogenous drivers (7) - Infrastructure
(none specified)Exogenous drivers (8) - Users
(none specified)Exogenous drivers (8) - Providers
(none specified)Human infrastructure (users)
(none specified)Human infrastructure (providers)
(none specified)Sources
Contributors
- Ute Brady, Arizona State University
- Livia Cruz, Arizona State University
- Elicia Ratajczyk, Arizona State University
Bibliography
- (1998). Indigenous Forest Management in the Bolivian Amazon: Lessons from the Yuracare People. People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance.. : 164-189
- (2010). A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management. Ecology and Society. 15 (4) : 38
-
(2016).
Explaining success and failure in the commons: the configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles.
International Journal of the Commons.
10
(2)
: 417–439
DOI: 10.18352/ijc.634