- Resource System
- Marine ecosystem
- Resource Units
- Whales
- Location
- Global (oceans)
This case study coincides with a master’s thesis project conducted by Melanie Sturm in 2013-2014. It is an analysis of the relevance for wildlife markets to meet conservation objectives. Markets stand to be instrumental as more natural resources face the risk of overexploitation and/ or under-provision of proper control mechanisms and supporting infrastructure. Granted, market solutions are not a panacea, but there are settings and species for which rights-based management is appropriate, and this warrants investigation. One such example of these mechanisms is 'catch shares' for which portions of the total allowable catch (TAC) are allocated to resource users. This case study addresses the question: What would be the result of broadening the economic paradigm of wildlife markets employed commonly in fisheries to a policy that incorporates protectionist interests?
Using whales as an illustrative example, this analysis explores the potential for catch shares to be a socially acceptable, economically efficient, and sustainable solution for certain wildlife plagued by a commons dilemma, and in doing so, identify the key considerations for rights-based management of threatened species.
1986-2013 (Moratorium)
Resource System
whales
Resource Users
-Commercial whaling (Iceland, Norway)
-Subsistence whaling (Denmark, Russia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, USA)
-Scientific whaling (Japan)
-very heterogeneous in culture, environmental ethics, socio-economics, political system, etc.
Public Infrastructure Providers
-Within countries: the government (e.g. NOAA in the US) or private industries
-At the international scale: the IWC
Public Infrastructure
Alliances between nations; international treaties, scientific knowledge, and a platform for discourse and decision making; national laws (e.g. US Marine Mammal Protection Act); indigenous networks and exchange of goods; rules and regulations of commercial market for whale meat (where applicable)
Relationship 1
Generally, the resource is freely accessible to take with the proper technology. The resource is mostly a cultural necessity not a dependency, though it does make up a fraction of Iceland and Norway's economy.
Relationship 2
Users and PI providers are nearly identical. One exception is the lobbying/ participation of non-governmental organizations in IWC meetings.
Relationship 3
Design, enact and enforce laws
Relationship 4
Scientific knowledge is based on changing resource conditions and status.
Relationship 5
Moratorium restricts use of resource (with exceptions)
Relationship 6
Monitoring and sanctioning, the capacity to do the latter is minor.
Exogenous Drivers 7 (Resource System)
Prey depletion, anthropogenic noise, sub-lethal ingestion of solid pollutants, collision with vessels, entanglement, bycatch, disease, overall habitat degradation (e.g. climate change, pollution)
Exogenous Drivers 7 (Public Infrastructure)
Political climate and unrelated international or domestic events; supply and demand of other food/ protein sources; scientific interest and funding
Exogenous Drivers 8 (Resource Users)
Political, cultural, economic, and biophysical disturbances that shake domestic and international processes and may divert attention from marine mammal conservation.
Exogenous Drivers 8 (Public Infrastructure Providers)
Political, cultural, economic, and biophysical disturbances that shake domestic and international processes and may divert attention from marine mammal conservation.
Human Infrastructure, Private and Human-Made (Resource Users)
(none specified)Human Infrastructure, Private and Human-Made (Public Infrastructure Providers)
(none specified)Theoretical Whale Market
Resource System
whales
Resource Users
-Commercial whaling (Iceland, Norway)
-Subsistence whaling (Denmark, Russia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, USA)
-Scientific whaling (Japan)
-Countries with non-use/ preservation preferences
-NGOs
-very heterogeneous in culture, environmental ethics, socio-economics, political system, etc.
Public Infrastructure Providers
-Within countries: the government (e.g. NOAA in the US) or private industries
-At the international scale: the IWC or another relevant partner (e.g. WTO, CITES)
Public Infrastructure
-Platform for trading, discussions, decisions
-For whale market: Rules and regulations of trade
-Alliances between nations
-International treaties on marine wildlife
-Scientific knowledge
-Indigenous networks and exchange of goods
-Rules and regulations for commercial sale of whale meat (where applicable)
-National laws (e.g. US Marine Mammal Protection Act)
Relationship 1
Generally, the resource is freely accessible to take with the proper technology. The resource is mostly a cultural necessity not a dependency, though it does make up a fraction of Iceland and Norway's economy. A user's harvesting or retirement of a unit of the resource is contingent upon owning whale shares. Dynamics among resource users themselves will affect what portion of the resource is harvested and what portion is preserved.
Relationship 2
Users and PI providers are closely overlapped. However, some users are of the private sector and therefore are not PI providers, and institutions that govern the market do not use the resource.
Relationship 3
Design, enact and enforce laws
Relationship 4
Scientific knowledge is based on changing resource conditions, and will affect the level of the TAC. The TAC will, in turn, influence the status of whale populations.
Relationship 5
The TAC and share allocation determine how much whaling may occur.
Relationship 6
Monitoring and sanctioning, the capacity to do the latter is minor. Based on share allocation, users will trade with each other to work out the most socially and economically viable situation.
Exogenous Drivers 7 (Resource System)
Prey depletion, anthropogenic noise, sub-lethal ingestion of solid pollutants, collision with vessels, entanglement, bycatch, disease, overall habitat degradation (e.g. climate change, pollution)
Market demand
Exogenous Drivers 7 (Public Infrastructure)
Political climate and unrelated international or domestic events; supply and demand of other food/ protein sources; scientific interest and funding in cetaceans
Exogenous Drivers 8 (Resource Users)
Political, cultural, economic, and biophysical disturbances that shake domestic and international processes and may divert attention from marine mammal conservation.
Exogenous Drivers 8 (Public Infrastructure Providers)
Political, cultural, economic, and biophysical disturbances that shake domestic and international processes and may divert attention from marine mammal conservation.
Human Infrastructure, Private and Human-Made (Resource Users)
(none specified)Human Infrastructure, Private and Human-Made (Public Infrastructure Providers)
(none specified)A market approach to saving the whales.. Nature. 481:139-140.
. 2012.Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse? Science. 321:1678-1681.
. 2008.Buying Whales to Save Them. Issues in Science and Technology. 29:58-68.
. 2013.Conservation markets for wildlife management with case studies from whaling. Ecological Applications. 24:4-14.
. 2014.Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 19:598-604.
. 2004. . 2013.