- Resource System
- Terrestrial land and associated watershed
- Resource Units
- Floodplain Basin Agriculture in the Egyptian Nile Valley and Delta
- Location
- Nile Valley and Delta, Egypt
Situated in the Nile Valley from Aswan to the Mediterranean, New Kingdom Egypt (c.1550-1050 B.C.) had an agrarian economy - almost entirely dependent on agriculture for subsistence. Because the climate was too dry for rain-fed farming, all agriculture was restricted to the narrow Nile Valley floodplain. However, due to spatio-temporal fluctuations in Nile flood levels, the amount of water (and thus arable land) in New Kingdom Egypt could also fluctuate greatly. In order to mitigate the risks involved with too-high or too low Nile floods, a system of floodplain basin irrigation had to be managed and maintained by local people. This was primarily undertaken through the coercive power of local political-economic elite hierarchies that owned most of the land. In particular, teh system of collective basin irrigation maintenance and management was incentivized by (A) profit incentives, (B) subsistence dependence on landowners, and (C) coercion/slavery.
New Kingdom Egyptian Agriculture
Resource System
-seasonal Nile floodwater
-floodplain land inundate by the Nile floods
Resource Users
-plantations/estates
-smallholders, tenants, dependent laborers, slaves
-landowners
Public Infrastructure Providers
-wealthy local landowners holding public office, with private dominion over their dependents and property
Public Infrastructure
Irrigation works:
-canals
-dykes
-levees
-berms
-river channel (often artificially deepened)
Relationship 1
-the ratio between water availability and irrigable farmland during low flood years
-the high velocity and volume of floodwaters during high flood years
Relationship 2
-labor and agricultural produce extraction from farmers by landowners
-dependence of peasants on landed patrons for livelihood
-dependence of landed patrons on local peasants for labor
-landed elite patron officeholders provide juridical oversight, law enforcement, courts
-peasants susceptible to labor tax levy (corvee)
Relationship 3
-officeholders responsible for maintaining irrigation infrastructure through labor tax (corvee)
-all landowners responsible for maintaining their private irrigation infrastructure through dependent labor
-landowners responsible for coordination of floodwater irrigation management during seasonal inundation, with infringements on rules subject to law enforcement
Relationship 4
-irrigation infrastructure controls, guides, and holds water with respect to agricultural land to facilitate cultivation
Relationship 5
-irrigation infrastructure maximizes the arable land coverage of low floods by guiding water to basins and regulating flow velocity/volume
-irrigation infrastructure minimizes damage that high/violent floods can do to irrigation infrastructure, soils, and settlements
Relationship 6
-landowners and (both dependent and independent) farmers must cooperate to maintain irrigation infrastructure
-workers on irrigation infrastructure must comply with task mandates of ruling hierarchy or else face harsh penalties
Exogenous Drivers 7 (Resource System)
-annual, decadal, centennial, and millennial scale spatiotemporal fluctuations in monsoon rainfall over Nile watershed causes variability in Nile flood levels
Exogenous Drivers 7 (Public Infrastructure)
-destruction of irrigation infrastructure during high/violent floods (possibly leading to famine)
-scarcity of farmland during low floods (possibly leading to famine)
Exogenous Drivers 8 (Resource Users)
-demographic growth, leading to abundance of labor but scarcity of land (exaggerated during bad flood years)
-increases in tax (labor, military) and rent demands by ruling landed elite hierarchy
-loss of patronage (gifts, jobs, positions, favor) by landed elite patrons
Exogenous Drivers 8 (Public Infrastructure Providers)
-demographic growth, leading to competition over land and office among landed elites
-increases in tax (labor, military) demands by the state
-loss of patronage (gifts, jobs, positions, favor) by region/state level elites and officeholders
Human Infrastructure, Private and Human-Made (Resource Users)
(none specified)Human Infrastructure, Private and Human-Made (Public Infrastructure Providers)
(none specified)Cesaretti R, Arizona State University.
Brady U, Arizona State University.